高效的SQLSERVER分頁查詢(推薦)_Mssql數據庫教程

      編輯Tag賺U幣

      推薦:SQL Server2012在開發中的一些新特性
      SQL Server 2012已經發布一段時間了,最近在新的機器上安裝了最新的SQL Server 2012 SP1,體檢下感覺良好。官方給出了一大堆SQL2012相對于SQL2008R2的新特性,但是大多數對于普通開發人員來說都是浮云,根本用不到,下面就說說一些對于開發人員來說比較有用的新特性。

      第一種方案、最簡單、普通的方法:

      復制代碼 代碼如下:www.wf0088.com

      SELECT TOP 30 * FROM ARTICLE WHERE ID NOT IN(SELECT TOP 45000 ID FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) ORDER BY YEAR DESC,ID DESC

      平均查詢100次所需時間:45s

      第二種方案:

      復制代碼 代碼如下:www.wf0088.com

      SELECT * FROM (  SELECT TOP 30 * FROM (SELECT TOP 45030 * FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) f ORDER BY f.YEAR ASC, f.ID DESC) s ORDER BY s.YEAR DESC,s.ID DESC

      平均查詢100次所需時間:138S

      第三種方案:

      復制代碼 代碼如下:www.wf0088.com

      SELECT * FROM ARTICLE w1,
      (
      SELECT TOP 30 ID FROM
      (
      SELECT TOP 50030 ID, YEAR FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC
      ) w ORDER BY w.YEAR ASC, w.ID ASC
      ) w2 WHERE w1.ID = w2.ID ORDER BY w1.YEAR DESC, w1.ID DESC

      平均查詢100次所需時間:21S

      第四種方案:

      復制代碼 代碼如下:www.wf0088.com

      SELECT * FROM ARTICLE w1
      WHERE ID in
      (
      SELECT top 30 ID FROM
      (
      SELECT top 45030 ID, YEAR FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC
      ) w ORDER BY w.YEAR ASC, w.ID ASC
      )
      ORDER BY w1.YEAR DESC, w1.ID DESC

      平均查詢100次所需時間:20S

      第五種方案:

      復制代碼 代碼如下:www.wf0088.com

      SELECT w2.n, w1.* FROM ARTICLE w1, (  SELECT TOP 50030 row_number() OVER (ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) n, ID FROM ARTICLE ) w2 WHERE w1.ID = w2.ID AND w2.n > 50000 ORDER BY w2.n ASC

      平均查詢100次所需時間:15S

      查詢第1000-1030條記錄

      第一種方案:

      復制代碼 代碼如下:www.wf0088.com

      SELECT TOP 30 * FROM ARTICLE WHERE ID NOT IN(SELECT TOP 1000 ID FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) ORDER BY YEAR DESC,ID DESC

      平均查詢100次所需時間:80s

      第二種方案:

      復制代碼 代碼如下:www.wf0088.com

      SELECT * FROM (   SELECT TOP 30 * FROM (SELECT TOP 1030 * FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) f ORDER BY f.YEAR ASC, f.ID DESC) s ORDER BY s.YEAR DESC,s.ID DESC

      平均查詢100次所需時間:30S

      第三種方案:

      復制代碼 代碼如下:www.wf0088.com

      SELECT * FROM ARTICLE w1,
      (
      SELECT TOP 30 ID FROM
      (
      SELECT TOP 1030 ID, YEAR FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC
      ) w ORDER BY w.YEAR ASC, w.ID ASC
      ) w2 WHERE w1.ID = w2.ID ORDER BY w1.YEAR DESC, w1.ID DESC

      平均查詢100次所需時間:12S

      第四種方案:

      復制代碼 代碼如下:www.wf0088.com

      SELECT * FROM ARTICLE w1
      WHERE ID in
      (
      SELECT top 30 ID FROM
      (
      SELECT top 1030 ID, YEAR FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC
      ) w ORDER BY w.YEAR ASC, w.ID ASC
      )
      ORDER BY w1.YEAR DESC, w1.ID DESC

      平均查詢100次所需時間:13S

      第五種方案:

      復制代碼 代碼如下:www.wf0088.com

      SELECT w2.n, w1.* FROM ARTICLE w1,(   SELECT TOP 1030 row_number() OVER (ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) n, ID FROM ARTICLE) w2 WHERE w1.ID = w2.ID AND w2.n > 1000 ORDER BY w2.n ASC

      平均查詢100次所需時間:14S

      由此可見在查詢頁數靠前時,效率3>4>5>2>1,頁碼靠后時5>4>3>1>2,再根據用戶習慣,一般用戶的檢索只看最前面幾頁,因此選擇3 4 5方案均可,若綜合考慮方案5是最好的選擇,但是要注意SQL2000不支持row_number()函數,由于時間和條件的限制沒有做更深入、范圍更廣的測試,有興趣的可以仔細研究下。

      以下是根據第四種方案編寫的一個分頁存儲過程:

      復制代碼 代碼如下:www.wf0088.com

      if exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id = object_id(N'[dbo].[sys_Page_v2]') and OBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsProcedure') = 1)
      drop procedure [dbo].[sys_Page_v2]
      GO

      CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[sys_Page_v2]
      @PCount int output, --總頁數輸出
      @RCount int output, --總記錄數輸出
      @sys_Table nvarchar(100), --查詢表名
      @sys_Key varchar(50), --主鍵
      @sys_Fields nvarchar(500), --查詢字段
      @sys_Where nvarchar(3000), --查詢條件
      @sys_Order nvarchar(100), --排序字段
      @sys_Begin int, --開始位置
      @sys_PageIndex int, --當前頁數
      @sys_PageSize int --頁大小
      AS

      SET NOCOUNT ON
      SET ANSI_WARNINGS ON

      IF @sys_PageSize < 0 OR @sys_PageIndex < 0
      BEGIN
      RETURN
      END

      DECLARE @new_where1 NVARCHAR(3000)
      DECLARE @new_order1 NVARCHAR(100)
      DECLARE @new_order2 NVARCHAR(100)
      DECLARE @Sql NVARCHAR(4000)
      DECLARE @SqlCount NVARCHAR(4000)

      DECLARE @Top int

      if(@sys_Begin <=0)
      set @sys_Begin=0
      else
      set @sys_Begin=@sys_Begin-1

      IF ISNULL(@sys_Where,'') = ''
      SET @new_where1 = ' '
      ELSE
      SET @new_where1 = ' WHERE ' + @sys_Where

      IF ISNULL(@sys_Order,'') <> ''
      BEGIN
      SET @new_order1 = ' ORDER BY ' + Replace(@sys_Order,'desc','')
      SET @new_order1 = Replace(@new_order1,'asc','desc')

      SET @new_order2 = ' ORDER BY ' + @sys_Order
      END
      ELSE
      BEGIN
      SET @new_order1 = ' ORDER BY ID DESC'
      SET @new_order2 = ' ORDER BY ID ASC'
      END

      SET @SqlCount = 'SELECT @RCount=COUNT(1),@PCount=CEILING((COUNT(1)+0.0)/'
      + CAST(@sys_PageSize AS NVARCHAR)+') FROM ' + @sys_Table + @new_where1

      EXEC SP_EXECUTESQL @SqlCount,N'@RCount INT OUTPUT,@PCount INT OUTPUT',
      @RCount OUTPUT,@PCount OUTPUT

      IF @sys_PageIndex > CEILING((@RCount+0.0)/@sys_PageSize) --如果輸入的當前頁數大于實際總頁數,則把實際總頁數賦值給當前頁數
      BEGIN
      SET @sys_PageIndex = CEILING((@RCount+0.0)/@sys_PageSize)
      END

      set @sql = 'select '+ @sys_fields +' from ' + @sys_Table + ' w1 '
      + ' where '+ @sys_Key +' in ('
      +'select top '+ ltrim(str(@sys_PageSize)) +' ' + @sys_Key + ' from '
      +'('
      +'select top ' + ltrim(STR(@sys_PageSize * @sys_PageIndex + @sys_Begin)) + ' ' + @sys_Key + ' FROM '
      + @sys_Table + @new_where1 + @new_order2
      +') w ' + @new_order1
      +') ' + @new_order2

      print(@sql)

      Exec(@sql)

      GO

      分享:sql where 1=1的優缺點分析
      where 1=1; 這個條件始終為True,在不定數量查詢條件情況下,1=1可以很方便的規范語句

      來源:模板無憂//所屬分類:Mssql數據庫教程/更新時間:2013-04-23
      相關Mssql數據庫教程